The scientific community is at a pivotal juncture, emphasizing the importance of proper data generation, management, and reuse. The FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles exemplify a healthy scientific data environment. These principles also form the basis for producing Model-Quality data, essential for powering AI and ML today and in the future. Using a variety of tools to gain scientific insights accelerates the understanding and resolution of complex questions and challenges in biology and chemistry.
Currently, there are significant theoretical and practical discussions regarding the approach to scientific data generation and its automated curation and reuse within the life sciences industry. One perspective advocates for generating data without immediate concern for metadata, suggesting that it can be added later, potentially with AI assistance. Conversely, another perspective insists on capturing all necessary metadata during data collection to ensure Model-Quality Data, arguing that any subsequent imputation could compromise data quality and introduce bias.
Advocates of automated data cleansing argue that tools and algorithms can automatically identify and rectify data issues (such as duplicates, errors, and inconsistencies), thereby enhancing the accuracy and quality of scientific data management. While this is widely accepted, there is a notion that data collection can be optimized for better accuracy at the point of capture.
On the other hand, advocates of manual data cleansing, particularly in smaller organizations or specific industries, contend that human oversight is invaluable for understanding data context and making informed decisions regarding data quality.
A hybrid approach could also be viable: combining manual and automated data cleansing. Specific data workflows could transition to automation following a period of maturation or evolution. Proponents of Model-Quality data emphasize the importance of generating high-quality data from the outset, prioritizing quality over quantity. Model-Quality Data ensures that scientific data is ready for machine learning (ML) and AI applications through rigorous validation techniques, continuous monitoring, and best practices in data governance.
One potential downside to data cleansing and imputation is the ethical implication of altering data. Introducing bias, whether inadvertently or intentionally, can significantly impact the quality and value of scientific data. Such practices could undermine ML or AI applications and hinder the efficiency of drug or therapy discovery and clinical outcomes.Big data, such as multi-omics data, imaging data, and clinical data, poses additional challenges due to its high production cost and complexity in integration, often stemming from poor contextualization/metadata capture. Apart from proper metadata, addressing these challenges requires high-quality design of experiments (DOE), data standards, and effective curation and management practices, such as data versioning and summarization rules, to achieve proper data governance.
Ultimately, achieving functional Data Governance and Compliance through a comprehensive Scientific Data Strategy is crucial for improving data quality, integration, and collaboration.
Each approach offers valuable insights, and the optimal strategy often depends on the specific context and requirements of the AI project.
SciY is at the forefront of creating and managing FAIR data environments for life sciences. Their ZONTAL digital Data Platform, for example, upholds these principles to achieve Model-Quality Data, ensuring that complex scientific data environments can seamlessly integrate to maximize insights and discovery.
There is a growing awareness of the ethical implications of data usage in AI. Organizations are focusing on ethical data management practices to safeguard privacy and build trust in AI technologies.
The utilization of AI and machine learning in data management processes is increasing. These technologies can automate various tasks and enhance data quality and integrity.
In summary, data cleansing and management is evolving towards automation, ethical issues, and continuous enhancement. Companies and institutions are recognizing the critical role of these factors in the successful deployment of AI solutions and applications.